No Legal Highs

Legal highs contain new substances that are not yet regulated by the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. Often, ingredients are also modified in order to circumvent any prohibition. Starting Thursday, “legal highs” will become illegal under the Psychoactive Substances Act. This means that the production, distribution, sale and supply of legal highs for human consumption will be prohibited at all levels. There are also fears that the sale of “legal highs” will migrate to the dark web. Many people think it`s safer to look for legal highs than to take illegal drugs. However, if you`re looking for ways to reach a legal peak, you might want to think again. The law will also allow police to shut down “headshops” (stores where “legal highs” and drug paraphernalia can be purchased) and online retailers. They can also seize and destroy psychoactive substances, as well as search people, premises and vehicles. Below are all the dangers you may encounter when using legal highs. The advantage of NPS appears to be that these drugs are designed to have similar effects to traditional recreational drugs, but are affordable, widely available and, importantly for many, legal.6 Users of existing drugs may be encouraged by the fact that most NPS are undetectable in urine screenings.7 The majority of NPS are synthetic cannabinoids, with a significant proportion of stimulants.2 However, the reality is that NPS is difficult to categorize because NPS products can be chemically similar but have very different psychotropic effects.5 In addition, the compounds are often mixed. Synthetic cannabinoids are typically sold in products combined with benzodiazepines, hallucinogens or stimulants.5 They are known to be much more potent than cannabis, raising concerns about their long-term health effects.

In addition, dependence can occur after relatively short-term use.5 With the recent introduction of the Psychoactive Substances Act,12 steps are being taken to prohibit the production, distribution and sale of NPS. However, in the absence of legislation, the consumption of “legal highs” continues to increase. More research is needed on the short- and long-term consequences of use and on the most appropriate therapeutic approach to treat patients taking NPS. “Legal highs (or psychoactive substances) are really chemicals, they are not drugs as such, they are chemicals bought in the Far East and there can be anything in these materials. They are produced in laboratories without any form of quality control; You just don`t know what`s in these packages. Drugs formerly known as “legal highs” are chemicals that have similar effects to MDMA, mephedrone or cocaine. Mephedrone itself was a “legal high” before being reclassified, and the entire group was declared illegal under the May 2016 Psychoactive Substances Act. A legal effect is the recovery of “new psychoactive substances” (NPS). NPS is also commonly referred to as “legal highs”, “bath salts”, “research chemicals”, “synthetic drugs” or “synthetic drugs”. Based on its common name “legal high”, you might think that you will not suffer any legal consequences from taking these substances. But it`s a big misunderstanding here in this country. Legal highs are not only dangerous to your health.

As described in a previous section, possession of legal drugs in prison can lead to legal consequences. “Legal highs” are substances that have effects similar to those of prohibited drugs such as cocaine or cannabis. It should be noted that the Psychoactive Substances Act does not include possession of legal highs as a criminal offence. Indeed, the law aims to take action against manufacturers and distributors and not against consumers of substances. Despite a general decline in drug abuse in recent years, the use of so-called “legal highs” or new psychoactive substances (NPS) has increased exponentially, with new brands, chemicals and products multiplying rapidly in a new and evolving market. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime recently reported more than twice as many new substances as it did 2 years ago.2 In addition, the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction reports that two new NPS are available on the European market almost every week.3 In the face of such a rapidly growing market, It is difficult to track what these products contain, what their psychoactive effects are and how best to treat the patients who take them. Worryingly, the coloured packaging of NPS is aimed at the younger population.6 In the UK, DrugScope suggests that the typical NPS user is a vulnerable young person living in socio-economic distress, too young to engage in club drug use, with limited disposable income, and who now has easy access to intoxicating substances that are still legal.6 The Royal College of Psychiatrists disagrees. There is also evidence that NPS users are more likely to be busy and have built social networks.7 There is also evidence of the merging of drug markets.

For example, in recent years, the missale of a very long-lived cathinone, n-ethylpentylon, has appeared in the form of MDMA, causing significant problems for festival-goers. It looks and smells almost identical to MDMA, is cheap and easy to get on the dark web, and is legal in China, making it very appealing to providers, but can take users on a horrific and challenging journey that lasts up to four days and potentially leads to full-fledged psychosis – as The Loop saw this summer. New psychoactive substances may seem like an unpleasant term, but it`s more accurate than “legal highs.” You`ll always hear people talk about legal highs, and since it`s a widely used term, you might still find it on this website, but they`re all illegal. The law on psychoactive substances was due to enter into force on 6 April, but legal deadlines were not met and there were concerns about the applicability of the blanket ban. This is an older law that prevents the abuse of controlled drugs. Basically, drugs such as cocaine and ecstasy made it illegal to manufacture, supply or import these substances. In addition to some unpleasant side effects, legal drugs can certainly be addictive. Signs of addiction for these substances can vary depending on exactly what you are taking. Even if you`ve already taken the legal highs, you can`t guarantee that you`ll always have the same reactions. Batches can vary considerably because there are no standards or regulations for the manufacturing process of these substances.

However, the line is very thin when it comes to this legislation. If you have a small amount of legal drugs in your possession, but are caught giving to your friends, you could be prosecuted for distributing those drugs. This is true even if you don`t take money from your friends for this exchange. Indeed, while some are classified as stimulants, others are sedatives. As with other drugs (legal or not), the signs of use (and abuse) will be different depending on the class of drug you are using. Drugs containing one or more chemical substances with effects similar to drugs such as cocaine, cannabis and ecstasy – formerly known as “legal highs” The Psychoactive Substances Act does not replace this Act. As a result, this means that everything that was previously illegal is still illegal, and drugs that are considered “legal highs” are now also illegal. In August 2018, the UK Court of Appeal ruled that it does not matter whether a substance has a direct or indirect psychoactive effect on the central nervous system – in both cases, it falls under the law. This case concerned nitrous oxide (nitrous oxide), but also had effects on alkyl nitrites (poppers).

In fact, the legal definition of a pychoactive substance is now so broad that it potentially includes any substance that is not expressly exempted by law. Churches that handle incense can break the law. People who sell lavender can now be sued for its mildly sedative and relaxing effects. Whether they use legal or illegal drugs, a person can develop an addiction. Even if you prefer to get a legal high, it is possible to become addicted to this substance. We said that the law, once introduced, would lead to legal complications because of its confusing definition of a psychoactive substance. We expected that the closure of headshops would change drug use patterns, with new substance use moving to the most vulnerable groups such as prisoners and the homeless. And we also suggested that the law would lead to a merger of the market for new psychoactive substances with the existing illicit drug trade. All these predictions came true. When the Psychoactive Substances Act was passed by Parliament, we agreed that it would shut down “headshops” selling legal highs, or “new psychoactive substances,” as they are more accurately called.